Consensus-based ethical best practices for performing educational point-of-care ultrasonography in the emergency department.

Objectives: There is no standardized protocol for performing educational point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) that addresses patient-centered ethical issues such as obtaining informed consent. This study sought to define principles for ethical application of educational POCUS and develop consensus-based best practice guidance. Methods: A questionnaire was developed by a trained ethicist after literature review with the help of a medical librarian. A diverse panel including experts in medical education, law, and bioethics; medical trainees; and individuals with no medical background was convened. The panel voted on their level of agreement with ethical principles and degree of appropriateness of behaviors in three rounds of a modified Delphi process. A high level of agreement was defined as 80% or greater consensus. Results: Panelists voted on 38 total items: 15 related to the patient consent and selection process, eight related to practices while performing educational POCUS, and 15 scenarios involving POCUS application. A high level of agreement was achieved for 13 items related to patient consent and selection, eight items related to performance practices, and 10 scenarios of POCUS application. Conclusions: Based on expert consensus, ethical best practices include obtaining informed consent before performing educational POCUS, allowing patients to decline educational POCUS, informing patients the examination is not intended to be a part of their medical evaluation and is not billed, using appropriate draping techniques, maintaining a professional environment, and disclosing incidental findings in coordination with the primary team caring for the patient. These practices could be implemented at institutions to encourage ethical use of educational POCUS when training physicians, fellows, residents, and medical students.

Artificial intelligence versus expert: a comparison of rapid visual inferior vena cava collapsibility assessment between POCUS experts and a deep learning algorithm.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to create a deep learning algorithm to determine the degree of inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility in critically ill patients to enable novice point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) providers. METHODS: We used publicly available long short term memory (LSTM) deep learning basic architecture that can track temporal changes and relationships in real-time video, to create an algorithm for ultrasound video analysis. The algorithm was trained on public domain IVC ultrasound videos to improve its ability to recognize changes in varied ultrasound video. A total of 220 IVC videos were used, 10% of the data was randomly used for cross correlation during training. Data were augmented through video rotation and manipulation to multiply effective training data quantity. After training, the algorithm was tested on the 50 new IVC ultrasound video obtained from public domain sources and not part of the data set used in training or cross validation. Fleiss' κ was calculated to compare level of agreement between the 3 POCUS experts and between deep learning algorithm and POCUS experts. RESULTS: There was very substantial agreement between the 3 POCUS experts with κ = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.49-0.81). Agreement between experts and algorithm was moderate with κ = 0.45 (95% CI = 0.33-0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm showed good agreement with POCUS experts in visually estimating degree of IVC collapsibility that has been shown in previously published studies to differentiate fluid responsive from fluid unresponsive septic shock patients. Such an algorithm could be adopted to run in real-time on any ultrasound machine with a video output, easing the burden on novice POCUS users by limiting their task to obtaining and maintaining a sagittal proximal IVC view and allowing the artificial intelligence make real-time determinations.

Telehealth Solutions for In-hospital Communication with Patients Under Isolation During COVID-19.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a public health crisis that has quickly overwhelmed our healthcare system. It has led to significant shortages in personal protective equipment (PPE), ventilators, and intensive care unit beds across the nation. As the initial entry point for patients with suspected COVID illness, emergency departments (ED) have had to adapt quickly to prioritize the safety of patients and providers while still delivering optimal, timely patient care. COVID-19 has presented many challenges for the ED that also extend to all inpatient services. Some of these key challenges are the fundamental tasks of communicating with patients in respiratory isolation while minimizing PPE usage and enabling all patients who have been affected by hospitals' visitor restrictions to connect with their families. We discuss the design principles behind implementing a robust in-hospital telehealth system for patient-provider and patient-family communication, provide a review of the strengths and weaknesses of potential videoconferencing options, and deliver concise, step-by-step guides for setting up a secure, low-cost, user-friendly solution that can be rapidly deployed.

Establishing the Key Outcomes for Pediatric Emergency Medical Services Research.

The evidence supporting best practices when treating children in the prehospital setting or even the effect emergency medical services (EMS) has on patient outcomes is limited. Standardizing the critical outcomes for EMS research will allow for focused and comparable effort among the small but growing group of pediatric EMS investigators on specific topics. Standardized outcomes will also provide the opportunity to collectively advance the science of EMS for children and demonstrate the effect of EMS on patient outcomes. This article describes a consensus process among stakeholders in the pediatric emergency medicine and EMS community that identified the critical outcomes for EMS care in five clinical areas (traumatic brain injury, general injury, respiratory disease/failure, sepsis, and seizures). These areas were selected based on both their known public health importance and their commonality in EMS encounters. Key research outcomes identified by participating stakeholders using a modified nominal group technique for consensus building, which included small group brainstorming and independent voting for ranking outcomes that were feasible and/or important for the field.

Bedside Ultrasound Reduces Diagnostic Uncertainty and Guides Resuscitation in Patients With Undifferentiated Hypotension.

OBJECTIVES: Utilization of ultrasound in the evaluation of patients with undifferentiated hypotension has been proposed in several protocols. We sought to assess the impact of an ultrasound hypotension protocol on physicians' diagnostic certainty, diagnostic ability, and treatment and resource utilization. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Emergency department in a single, academic tertiary care hospital. SUBJECTS: A convenience sample of patients with a systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg after an initial fluid resuscitation, who lacked an obvious source of hypotension. INTERVENTIONS: An ultrasound-trained physician performed an ultrasound on each patient using a standardized hypotension protocol. Differential diagnosis and management plan was solicited from the treating physician immediately before and after the ultrasound. Blinded chart review was conducted for management and diagnosis during the emergency department and inpatient hospital stay. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoints were the identification of an accurate cause for hypotension and change in physicians' diagnostic uncertainty. The secondary endpoints were changes in treatment plan, use of resources, and changes in disposition after performing the ultrasound. One hundred eighteen patients with a mean age of 62 years were enrolled. There was a significant 27.7% decrease in the mean aggregate complexity of diagnostic uncertainty before and after the ultrasound hypotension protocol (1.85-1.34; -0.51 [95% CI, -0.41 to -0.62]) as well as a significant increase in the absolute proportion of patients with a definitive diagnosis from 0.8% to 12.7%. Overall, the leading diagnosis after the ultrasound hypotension protocol demonstrated excellent concordance with the blinded consensus final diagnosis (Cohen k = 0.80). Twenty-nine patients (24.6%) had a significant change in the use of IV fluids, vasoactive agents, or blood products. There were also significant changes in major diagnostic imaging (30.5%), consultation (13.6%), and emergency department disposition (11.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical management involving the early use of ultrasound in patients with hypotension accurately guides diagnosis, significantly reduces physicians' diagnostic uncertainty, and substantially changes management and resource utilization in the emergency department.